Comment_fic prompts :P
Mar. 30th, 2009 01:07 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
darkdreamerHey, guys, I just posted loooads of House/Wilson prompts at ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
comment_fic ! For the Buffy fans on my list, there's a few Buffy and A:tS prompts on there as well, as well as a handful of prompts from my other fandoms -- QaF, Dexter, HIMYM, etc... My prompts are all found in the first 4 pages of comments, but they're scattered a bit.
Linkage: community.livejournal.com/comment_fic/27428.html
Feel free to swing by and comment with a little bitty ficcie, if you're a member -- and to join and do so if you're not :p hehe
Have fun!!
*hugs*
DoS
comment_fic ! For the Buffy fans on my list, there's a few Buffy and A:tS prompts on there as well, as well as a handful of prompts from my other fandoms -- QaF, Dexter, HIMYM, etc... My prompts are all found in the first 4 pages of comments, but they're scattered a bit.Linkage: community.livejournal.com/comment_fic/27428.html
Feel free to swing by and comment with a little bitty ficcie, if you're a member -- and to join and do so if you're not :p hehe
Have fun!!
*hugs*
DoS
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
your icon...
Date: 2009-03-30 03:49 pm (UTC)I am having a love/hate relationship with it. I love it because it reminds me why I don't like LE. I also hate it because it reminds me of why I don't like LE. This is my favorite example to use during anti-LE conversations.
Did you make it?
Re: your icon...
Date: 2009-03-30 04:27 pm (UTC)no, i didn't make it, i've credited the maker in my userpics... but i took it because i *love* LE and because i found this little exchange rather cute :P
*shrugs*
to each their own :P
Re: your icon...
Date: 2009-03-30 06:09 pm (UTC)It's just that I, and a few folks that I talk to, find this sort of behavior on LE's part to be inappropriate, and I wasn't sure if your icon was reflecting that.
I shouldn't have assumed. Didn't mean to catch you off guard. :-)